The Problem We Face Is Structural, Not Personal
Britain’s decline is not a modern accident. It is the predictable outcome of centuries of mismanagement, elite privilege, and democratic stagnation. Understanding the truth is the first step to fixing it.
The roots of our modern democratic dysfunction go back to the settlement that followed the English Civil Wars. Parliament wanted power but had no clear plan for how to govern effectively without a monarch. Cromwell was pushed into becoming a de facto monarch, and when he died, Parliament, full of factions and fearing conflict and Catholics, restored the Crown but left the power structure half finished.
What we have lived with ever since is a hybridised system, part medieval, part semi democratic, that has never truly worked. It relies on conventions instead of law, symbolism instead of accountability, and inherited procedures instead of democratic clarity.
The result is a system where Parliament holds the real power, the Crown holds the symbolic power, Ministers hold the executive power, and no one holds any responsibility. There is no clear line of legal accountability, no binding oath of public duty, and no enforceable standards for those who exercise power on behalf of the public.
This is not the fault of any monarch. Charles is as much a victim of this bodge as the British public, he stuck living as a prisoner in this limbo state of a monarch with potential influence, but no true power.
It is the consequence of a constitutional compromise created centuries ago that has never been modernised.
And today, that compromise is breaking down, producing exactly the outcomes the Civil War was meant to prevent – unaccountable power, public frustration, stagnation, and a political culture where corruption slips through the gaps.
The system needs repair, not reverence.
And that repair begins with real accountability in public life – but let’s break this down into a simple form first…
Parliament demanded power during the English Civil Wars
They broke the divine-right monarchy because it was unaccountable and abusive.
So far, so reasonable.
But what they created afterwards was not democracy — it was a power vacuum filled by factions.
Cromwell became a de facto monarch
Not by ambition, but because the system had no working model for governance without a crown.
He ended up being:
- the symbolic head
- the military head
- the executive head
- A monarch in all but name.
The system around him never stabilised, because Parliament was too factional and too self-interested to govern effectively.
After Cromwell’s death, they restored the monarchy, but only as a patchwork of constitutional power.
Instead of repairing the system, they re-attached the monarchy and glued Parliament onto it, creating a hybrid that:
- is neither fully democratic
- nor fully constitutional
- nor fully accountable
- nor fully modern
- nor fit for a contemporary society
This isn’t a modern problem – it’s a 360-year-old structural flaw.
This hybrid system shields politicians from accountability
Because the system’s power structure is confused:
- The symbolic power sits with the Crown
- The real power sits with Parliament
- The administrative power sits with Ministers
- The legal power sits with ancient Acts
- The procedural power sits with conventions
- The consequence power sits nowhere
This is why:
- laws are confusing
- authority is unclear
- responsibility is diffuse
- ethical duty is undefined
- misconduct falls between the cracks
The Civil War was fought to end unaccountable power.
- But the settlement they produced is exactly that.
- And that’s why modern Britain is paralysed
A hybrid system:
- can’t reform itself
- can’t punish corruption
- can’t modernise
- can’t deliver public services
- can’t balance power
- can’t enforce integrity
- can’t respond to crises
So, the nation gets.
- Political unaccountability,
- Political Corruption
- Political Apathy
- Political Stagnation
- Public Mistrust of the political class at all levels.
- Breakdown of what little democracy we had.
- Increase in authoritarian rule.
- Incremental creep to a Police state.
This is NOT because of Charles III.
It isn’t because of “the monarchy”.
It is because of the structural bodge job of 1660–1690 that has never been repaired.
It is because of the political games played in the corridors of Westminster and the apathy shown by generations of politicians to the plight and needs of the population of the country because most only cared about themselves, their power, their influence and their lives.
The Circle of Oaths and the Illusion of Accountability
To understand how we arrived at a position where political misconduct is tolerated, we must look beyond behaviour and into the legal machinery supporting it. There is a widespread assumption that Members of Parliament, Ministers, and holders of senior public office swear meaningful, enforceable oaths. They do not.
The oath requirement that exists today is the product of a circular, self-referencing system of Victorian Acts that give an illusion of accountability without establishing any real obligations. The legislation looks impressive on paper — Promissory Oaths Act 1868, Parliamentary Oaths Act 1866, Clerical Subscription Act 1875 — but when you trace each reference carefully, you eventually discover:
- Modern MPs do not swear a statutory oath of public duty.
- Ministers of the Crown swear no statutory oath at all.
- There is no legal obligation for honesty, integrity, or public service.
- The only oath required to sit in Parliament is an oath of allegiance to the Monarch.
This is not the fault of the Monarch.
It is the result of centuries of incremental patchwork, where Parliament repeatedly modified, repealed or replaced oath provisions without ever creating a modern, democratic alternative.
The Promissory Oaths Act 1868 appears to create a unified system, but when Section 6 refers the reader to earlier legislation, that legislation is either:
- partially repealed,
- applicable only to Peers,
- or applicable to obsolete ministerial positions such as the Minister of Fisheries or the Minister of Coal Production.
For current Ministers, including Secretaries of State and even the Prime Minister, there is no statutory oath of office whatsoever.
The system is a loop of historical references designed to look complete, while materially containing no enforceable duties. It is constitutional theatre. Meaningful responsibility simply does not exist in statute and therefore cannot be enforced in law.
The Consequences of an Oath System Without Duties
The practical effect of this circular and meaningless oath structure is profound:
- MPs and Ministers enter office with no binding legal obligations to the public.
- Ethical codes exist only as conventions, and conventions have no legal teeth.
- Misconduct is handled internally, not through independent law.
- Political corruption is only punishable if it overlaps with ordinary criminal law, a high bar.
- Ministers who lie, mislead or behave corruptly cannot be legally removed unless their party acts.
- The public has no legal recourse against elected officials who abuse their position.
This is the exact opposite of what the Civil War was fought to achieve.
Instead of ending unaccountable power, Britain entrenched it.
The present-day United Kingdom is governed by a structure where the symbolic oath is enforceable, but the ethical duties of public office are not.
This is why scandal after scandal produces outrage but almost never produces consequences.
- Cash for Honours.
- Cash for Questions.
- MP Expenses.
- £7.1 billion in COVID procurement losses.
- The Baroness Mone PPE affair.
The list goes on.
And yet the same cycle repeats:
committees investigate, standards bodies comment, the media moves on — and nothing fundamentally changes.
Because nothing in statute compels change.
Why Schedule 8 Is Necessary
To break this historical cycle, Britain needs a legally binding, universal system of accountability. A system that does not rely on convention or symbolism, but on clear statutory duties and enforceable consequences.
This is exactly what Schedule 8 (to an updated Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010) will deliver.
Schedule 8 introduces:
- a universal oath of public duty, applying to all persons in public office
- clear, enforceable obligations of honesty, integrity, and impartiality
- criminal offences for misconduct, deception, and abuse of power
- universal coverage for MPs, Ministers, civil servants, police, judiciary, and contractors
- automatic suspension upon charge and automatic dismissal upon conviction
- heavy penalties for corruption, bribery, concealed interests, or manipulation
- an independent body with the power to investigate and prosecute
- a single standard of integrity across the entire public sector
For the first time in British history, every person exercising public authority would be bound by the same legal duties — from the Prime Minister to a police constable, from a prison governor to a procurement officer, from a judge to a contractor supplying public services.
- No favour.
- No fear.
- No bias.
- No exceptions.
A New Oath of Public Service (Schedule 8)
The new universal oath will be clear, modern and democratically grounded.
Every public officeholder will swear:
- to act honestly, impartially and lawfully
- to serve the public without favour or prejudice
- to avoid all corruption, inducement, and conflicts of interest
- to uphold the rights and safety of the people
- to remain accountable to the public
- to respect the rule of law and democratic governance
- to perform their duties without fear, favour or bias
This oath will not be symbolic.
It will be legally binding.
Breaking it will carry consequences ranging from suspension to criminal prosecution and imprisonment.
- This is how proper democracies operate.
- This is how you rebuild trust.
- This is how you end the centuries-old culture of unaccountable power.
Schedule 8 — Public Integrity, Anti-Corruption and Accountability Provisions
Proposed Insertion into the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 (as amended)
- Scope and Application
1.1 This Schedule applies to all persons holding public authority or exercising public functions within the United Kingdom, whether elected, appointed, uniformed, civilian, or contracted.
1.2 Without limitation, this Schedule applies to:
- Members of Parliament
- Ministers of the Crown
- The Prime Minister
- Members of the House of Lords
- All Civil Servants
- All Police Services (Home Office, devolved, BTP, CNC, MOD Police)
- The National Crime Agency
- HM Prison Service and probation staff
- HM Courts & Tribunals Service
- The Crown Prosecution Service and PPS Northern Ireland
- Fire & Rescue Services
- HM Coastguard and connected maritime services
- Ministry of Defence personnel in administrative, civilian or policing roles
- Local Authority officers exercising statutory powers
- Non-departmental public bodies
- Regulators and inspectorates
- Any contractor, subcontractor or consultant delivering public services or public contracts
1.3 All persons listed above are designated Public Officeholders for the purposes of this Schedule.
- Universal Oath of Public Service (Legally Binding)
2.1 Before assuming any public authority, every Public Officeholder shall swear the following Oath:
“I swear that I will discharge the duties of my office with honesty, integrity and impartiality, and that I will serve all individuals and the general public without fear, favour or bias; that I will, at all times, uphold both the letter and the spirit of the law and the principles of democratic government; that I will avoid and report all corruption, inducement or conflicts of interest; that I will act transparently and accountably; and that I will, at all times, place the welfare of the public and the nation above any personal, political or financial interests I may have and I understand that failure to comply with the ethical and legal standards required of my office may result in criminal prosecution, fines, imprisonment or any other sanctions that a court may see fit and appropriate. ”
2.2 The Oath shall be read aloud, then signed and witnessed and remains binding for the entire period during which public authority is exercised.
2.3 The Oath remains enforceable after an individual leaves public office. Any use of their former position, knowledge, access, influence or information for personal profit, without explicit written approval, or by deceitful means, constitutes a breach of statutory duty and an offence under this Schedule.
2.4 Breach of any part of this Oath constitutes a breach of statutory duty and may constitute a criminal offence under this Schedule.
- Statutory Public Duty
3.1 All Public Officeholders must:
- act with integrity and honesty
- serve the public interest above all private, partisan or personal interests
- avoid any action that brings public office into disrepute
- declare and avoid all conflicts of interest
- conduct themselves without fear, favour or bias
- maintain transparency in decision-making
- cooperate with lawful investigations
- uphold the highest standards of professional conduct
3.2 These duties override:
- party political instructions
- lobbying pressure
- private influence or inducement
- personal gain
- factional interests
- internal organisational culture
3.3 Any attempt by another person or organisation to pressure or induce a Public Officeholder into breaching these duties constitutes the offence of undue Influence, punishable under this Schedule.
PART 4 – Criminal Offences
The following offences apply to ALL Public Officeholders and all contractors providing goods or services to public bodies.
4.1 Abuse of Public Office (Major Offence)
A person commits this offence if they:
- misuse their authority to obtain personal, financial or political gain
- confer unlawful or improper advantage on any person
- use their position to influence decisions for non-public purposes
- intentionally mislead the public or decision-makers
Penalty:
- Maximum: Life imprisonment
- Minimum: 10 years
- Unlimited fine
- Permanent disqualification from any public role
- Confiscation of assets gained improperly
4.2 Misconduct in Public Office (Statutory Modernisation)
A person commits this offence if they:
- knowingly fail to perform a legal or statutory duty
- breach their Oath of Public Service
- intentionally conceal information relevant to public safety or governance
- violate financial, procurement or regulatory controls
Penalty:
- Maximum: 15 years
- Minimum: 5 years
- Unlimited fine
- Disqualification for 15 years
4.3 False Declaration of Interests (Strict Liability)
A person commits this offence if they:
- fail to declare assets, debts, income, foreign interests or beneficial ownership
- knowingly submit incomplete or misleading declarations
- conceal financial relations with contractors or lobbyists
Penalty:
- Maximum: 5 years
- Fine up to £250,000
- Five-year public office ban
4.4 Undue Influence and Corrupt Lobbying
A person commits this offence if they:
- exert influence on behalf of external parties in exchange for benefit
- accept gifts, favours, hospitality, payments or any material advantage
- grant access or influence improperly
- engage in unrecorded or undeclared lobbying
Penalty:
- Maximum: 10 years
- Unlimited fine
- Prohibition from public contracts for 10 years
4.5 Fraudulent or Deceptive Procurement
Applies to Ministers, officials, civil servants, police administrators, NHS managers, local authorities and ALL contractors.
Offence includes:
- securing contracts through deception or undisclosed conflicts
- inflating invoices
- misrepresenting capability
- exploiting emergency procurement processes for gain
- collusion or bid rigging
Penalty:
- Maximum: 20 years
- Unlimited fine
- Corporate liability for companies involved
- Director disqualification (15 years)
- Asset seizure under Proceeds of Crime Act
4.6 Deception of Parliament, the media or in Public
A person commits this offence if they knowingly:
- make false statements in Parliament or
- the media or
- in public or
- official documentation or
- mislead, obstruct or interfere with public accountability processes or
- suppress or alter information of public importance
Penalty:
- Minimum Penalty: 5 years Maximum: 10 years
- Automatic removal from office
- Life ban disqualification from public office or public contracts
PART 5 – Contractor and Corporate Liability
5.1 Any company, director, partner, employee or consultant involved in public contracts is criminally liable for offences under this Schedule.
- Any person commits an offence under this schedule if they knowingly make false statements related to public contracts.
- in Parliamentary enquiries,
- communications to
- MPs, their briefings or informal gatherings
- ministers, their briefings or informal gatherings
- local government councillors, their briefings or informal gatherings or
- other national or local government bodies,
- Civil servants briefings, emails or other communications, formally or otherwise.
- the media or
- in public or
- other official documentation or
- mislead, obstruct or interfere with public accountability processes or
- suppress or alter information of public importance.
- liaise or coordinate contract procurement with other contractors.
- liaise or fix contract prices with other suppliers or contractors.
- operate in unethical ways that may undermine public confidence in the government.
- seek to work with organisations, governments, individuals or entities banned by the British Government from trading in the United Kingdom or sanctioned under international laws.
5.2 Penalties include:
- Maximum Imprisonment: 25 years
- unlimited fines (Minimum 50% annual profit for Companies)
- director disqualification for life
- asset seizure, which may include entire company.
- mandatory exclusion from public contracts (5 to permanent)
PART 6 – Enforcement
6.1 A new independent body, Part of the Ministry of Defence Police, which shall be – Office of Public Integrity & Anti-Corruption (OPIAC) is established with statutory powers to:
- investigate
- compel documents and testimony
- initiate prosecutions
- enforce disqualification
- freeze and seize assets
- publish findings without political approval
6.2 OPIAC operates independently of Ministers, Parliament and civil service leadership.
6.3 The Ministry of Defence Police shall have its Powers extended to allow OPIAC to perform its duties unhindered and they shall have authority to investigate any and all publicly employed officials and contractors within the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, all British Overseas territories, Crown dependencies, British Embassies or where so ever British Civil servants public officers or contractors on behalf of the state may be employed.
6.4 The Ministry of Defence Police (OPIAC) will take over all investigations into all misconduct by Police officers and will have unrestricted access to all Police computer systems, stations, offices and records and files. Hindering such an investigation would constitute an offence under this schedule and leave the responsible person liable to arrest.
PART 7 — Suspension and Disqualification
7.1 Any person charged (indicted) under this Schedule is immediately suspended from duty.
7.2 Any person convicted is:
- removed from office
- disqualified for 5 years, or for the term of their sentence, whichever is longer
- stripped of all licences, clearances and authorisations
- required to undergo full retraining and recertification before returning to public life
- Where the sentence exceeds 5 years, they are automatically banned from public office for life and may not resist any certification courses.
PART 8 – Transparency Requirements
8.1 OPIAC must publish:
- annual reports
- all investigations concluded
- misconduct findings
- disqualification notices
- contractor breaches
- public registers of declared interests
- All information shall be published publicly, only information covered by GDPR, national Security or ongoing Criminal investigations shall be redacted with explanatory notes attached.
8.2 Information cannot be suppressed or censored by any Minister or department.
PART 9 – Transitional Provisions
9.1 All current Public Officeholders must sign the new Oath and Contract within 60 days of enactment.
9.2 Failure to do so results in suspension from office.
Appendix A — Public Duty and Ethics Contract (Legally Binding)
This Contract must be signed by every Public Officeholder before assuming authority.
- Duty of Service
I acknowledge that I serve the public, not myself, not my party, not any external interest.
I will honour all commitments made to my constituents and act transparently in all public matters.
- Conduct and Behaviour
I will act:
- honestly
- impartially
- respectfully
- lawfully
- transparently
- without fear, favour or bias
I will not mislead the public or any official body.
- Financial Integrity
I will:
- declare all financial interests
- refuse all gifts except modest refreshments
- hold no conflicting employment (MPs/Ministers)
- avoid all private financial gain from office
- Conflicts of Interest
- I will not participate in any decision in which I have a personal, financial or political interest.
- I will not lobby or influence for private benefit.
- Family Employment
- I will not employ or appoint any family member to any public position under my supervision.
- Suspension and Removal
I understand that:
- upon criminal charge I am suspended
- upon conviction I am removed
- I am disqualified for at least 5 years
- all certifications and licences are revoked
Anyone who takes a salary, fee, stipend, contract payment, consultancy fee, or any other form of compensation from public funds should be held to an enforceable ethical standard.
Public money is not “government money”.
It is taxpayer money, extracted from the labour, income, and lives of citizens.
Therefore, anyone benefitting from it must:
-
serve impartially
-
act honestly
-
uphold the law
-
protect the public interest
-
avoid corruption
-
report wrongdoing
-
face real accountability if they breach those duties
This is not radical — it is common sense.
The oath must be sworn by the individual, not the organisation
Companies cannot hold integrity.
Boards cannot swear personal accountability.
A logo cannot take responsibility for wrongdoing.
Only individuals can do that.
Therefore:
• Every employee of a public body swears the oath.
Civil servants, teachers, NHS staff, council workers, agency temps — everyone.
• Every contractor supplying goods or services to any public entity swears the oath personally.
Engineers, sub-contractors, consultants, IT specialists, architects, care providers.
• Every consultant or freelancer hired with public money swears the oath.
No exceptions.
It becomes impossible to hide misconduct behind corporate shields, subcontracting chains, or bureaucratic obfuscation.
The oath must be witnessed by a Judge or Commissioner for Oaths — never by a manager
Why?
Because:
-
Managers are part of the institutional hierarchy
-
They may be complicit in wrongdoing
-
They may be under pressure to “look the other way”
-
They cannot credibly hold their own employees to account
A judge or Commissioner for Oaths:
-
is independent
-
is legally trained
-
has no skin in the organisational game
-
creates a binding record
-
makes the oath a formal legal act
This is how you close the loophole of “internal investigations” — the most abused phrase in all public service.
Contractors swear the oath every time they sign a contract
This is one of the most powerful structural ideas you’ve developed.
Why?
Because:
-
each contract becomes a legally binding ethical instrument
-
it prevents the excuse “I swore that years ago – I forgot”
-
it creates a fresh duty of care each time public money is used
-
it stops serial offenders from hiding behind old paperwork
-
it ensures consistency and renewal of the ethical standard
It also means that if someone deliberately cuts corners, misuses funds, or engages in fraud:
they have breached a sworn legal undertaking
in direct connection with that exact contract.
- Oath of Public Service
I swear that I will discharge the duties of my office with honesty, integrity and impartiality, and that I will serve all individuals and the general public without fear, favour or bias; that I will, at all times, uphold both the letter and the spirit of the law and the principles of democratic government; that I will avoid and report all corruption, inducement or conflicts of interest; that I will act transparently and accountably; and that I will, at all times, place the welfare of the public and the nation above any personal, political or financial interests I may have and I understand that failure to comply with the ethical and legal standards required of my office may result in criminal prosecution, fines, imprisonment or any other sanctions that a court may see fit and appropriate.
Signature Block
Name ________________________
Role _________________________
Department / Constituency _____________________
Date ________________________
Witness _____________________